- Last Updated on Tuesday, 01 September 2009 23:55
- Published on Tuesday, 01 September 2009 23:55
- Hits: 392
The Westmoreland County Board of Zoning Appeals met on Aug. 24 to hear Frank Iannarelli’s appeal of a County Zoning Administration finding that mud bog activities on a property zoned as Business General near Leedstown needs special exception approval to continue.
Action was deferred until the Board of Zoning Appeals convenes its next meeting on Sept. 28, but evidence was entertained to support positions on both sides of the question.
The mud bog property was zoned A-1, Agricultural when Iannarelli first sought local government’s approval to hold three all-terrain vehicle mud bog events in April and May 2007.
The late Zoning Administrator Gary Ziegler at that time characterized the three special events as “a temporary land use issue” that could be accommodated by a special use permit. Ziegler reasoned that no special exception approval was needed because the three mud bog events were not proposed as a permanent or ongoing land use activity.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:23
- Published on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 18:23
- Hits: 388
O’Gara Training and Services, LLC bought the first 330.0-acre block of land from Bryan Chandler on July 28 and recorded the deed associated with its $2.5 million real estate transaction two days later in Westmoreland Circuit Court.
By the morning of July 31a Williamsburg contractor’s land disturbing equipment had arrived on the former Chandler land and crews were busy moving land where access roads would be installed. A county government land disturbance permit was issued and posted on site before the county government concluded its business that Friday afternoon.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 14:49
- Published on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 14:49
- Hits: 398
Robert and Margaret Quinn
3629 Cople Highway
Montross, Virginia 22520
August 23, 2009
Mr. Lynn C. Brownley
District No. 3
15411 Kings Highway
Montross, Virginia 22520
Dear Mr. Brownley:
Thank you for your letter. Improved communication is a goal of every citizen in this County. We have tried to understand the reasoning behind the O’Gara relocation here but have been given no concrete answers to our questions. Even the response you gave came with the caveat from Mr. Fisher that it was not the response of the Board.
Furthermore, unlike the Board of Supervisors, answering questions doesn’t take us six years.
Why do references to the Ziegler memo (categorizing O’Gara activities as comprising a vocational or technical school) continuously suggest that his opinion was bias and not objective?
We are not suggesting that Ziegler’s opinion was bias and not objective, we are suggesting it is wrong. The SIC government classification Ziegler references - 9711 (national security, military training schools) is not the SIC government classification of O’Gara - 8748 (business consulting), which negates the validity of the entire memo as it refers to O’Gara. Although O’Gara is not specifically mentioned in the memo, the O’Gara people were already secretly meeting with government officials inWestmoreland County. These officials chose to keep O’Gara’s presence a secret from the local citizens. Ziegler’s memo could be nothing less than tainted since he was specifically tasked with creating an opinion that would justify a group like O’Gara locating in Westmoreland County.
After seven months of public comment and input since the initial contract between O’Gara and the Industrial Development Authority, why do some persons continue to advance the assertion that the public has been excluded?
Although two anti-O’Gara citizen presentations have been made along with many questions and comments to the Board of Supervisors, all have been disregarded. Questions that were posed to the Board in early May of this year remain unanswered by the Board or the County. In fact, when Chairman Darryl Fisher was presented with almost 1,000 signatures against O’Gara, he said it could take “six years” for the Board to respond to the citizen’s questions. These questions are not difficult, especially if you believe O’Gara has the right to be here and will be beneficial to the county. And, if the Board believes O’Gara will be so great for WestmorelandCounty, why hasn’t it even tried to convince the public of this?
One can assume that the Board’s lack of responsiveness is a result of its inability to justify O’Gara’s presence and its lack of due diligence prior to contract negotiations. Giving people a forum for their perceived grievances is wonderful but what do you do then? You ignore them.
In June I believe I was close to authoring a performance agreement (contractual limitations on O’Gara activities) that the company would accept. I advised a number of citizens about this. Why do you suppose that there was so little interest or support for this effort?
Three citizens met with you one evening in early June. Although at that time our primary focus was keeping O’Gara out of Westmoreland County, we were supportive of placing limitations on O’Gara activities and a zoning change that would prevent any other business from calling itself a “school” and moving onto A-1 land without a public hearing. You may believe you were “close to authoring a performance agreement” but you presented nothing to us at that meeting, we heard nothing from you after that and you did nothing even though we emphasized the need for urgency in both of these instances. “Close” but no cigar, Mr. Brownley. Furthermore, a promise was made by you to local residents before both the July and August meetings to put a resolution for a zoning change before the Board. This promise remains unfulfilled and “pants on fire” seems to be the ongoing phrase to describe your activities (or lack thereof).
There was obviously significant public desire for Westmoreland County to “Just Say No” to O’Gara. How would you suggest that the BOS could have effectuated that?
An environmental, financial and community impact study should have been commissioned on such a controversial and potentially dangerous facility.
Before the contract was presented to the IDA, the BOS should have had a public hearing just as Essex, Louise and Shenandoah Counties did. Furthermore, the
BOS should have recommended that the IDA look at the ramifications of this contract by performing their public responsibility to the citizens and investigating both the pros and cons of bringing O’Gara to this County before jumping into a contract. Accepting O’Gara’s preliminary power point presentation as the gospel and signing a contract within minutes of viewing it is the height of incompetence and the BOS should have advised them against it.
The Board’s actions and activities with respect to the O’Gara proposal have been described as “deceptive” or the like. What is meant by that description? Could you offer a couple of examples?
“Deliberately misleading” is the charitable phrase that jumps to mind.
* O’Gara was “in the neighborhood” at least since last summer yet
county officials kept it a secret until January 2009.
* There were no public hearings.
* The IDA met behind closed doors (illegally?) and immediately
signed a contract with O’Gara - no public comment was allowed.
· The BOS repeatedly blames the IDA as if the BOS had nothing to
do with this fiasco.
· Promises to change the zoning laws to protect the county and its
citizens were never fulfilled.
· The BOS has refused to answer citizens’ questions.
· County officials (including you) taking O’Gara’s “guided tour”
never gave a formal report on their findings.
· There are no controls in place to insure citizen safety on or near the
O’Gara site. If a golf driving range requires a public hearing,
what about a live ammunition shooting range?
· O’Gara is being allowed to proceed with activities that are
expressly prohibited in the Westmoreland County Zoning Code,
i.e. storage of explosives and flammables.
* Please regarding the safety, health and well-being of the citizens fall
on deaf ears.
You can also refer to answer #4 regarding what the responsible Boards of other Counties did when facing the same issue from the same group
What sort of information or “proof” would be required to validate the assertion that O’Gara’s relocating, building and, operating here is a long term beneficial form of economic activity and commerce?
This is a question that has been posed to the Board of Supervisors numerous times. It was up to you as our elected representatives to convince us of O’Gara’s worth. You failed in that responsibility. The only response the Board has ever given to anyone is that O’Gara would bring economic growth. But you presented no supporting evidence. Now, let’s look at the facts. So far, the site plans, the land disturbance and the buildings being placed on the O’Gara property are ALL from outside sources. Surveyors, excavators and builders are available in Westmoreland County. Yet none of them were hired by O’Gara. Many of these local businesses have been forced to lay off workers. They are angry and disappointed that they were not considered for the O’Gara project despite the promises of economic growth by both county officials and O’Gara. These local businesses could have been doing the work O’Gara is now outsourcing to other counties. The housing of the O’Gara trainees will also not be done in Westmoreland County except a few at a tax-exempt facility. This outsourced work represents hundreds of thousands of dollars (possibly millions) in lost revenue to the people of this County. What happened to the economic growth you’ve been touting? To date, that’s our “proof.” What “proof” do you have?
Why do some citizens continue to opine that the company’s presence here will significantly reduce values of the surrounding real estate parcels? Can anyone point to a comparable scenario where such actually occurred?
You are in receipt of a copy of a letter from a nearby landowner on Nomini Creek, who had architectural plans drawn for an $800,000 home to be built by a local builder on the Nomini. He stopped short of signing the contract (which, by the way, would have employed builders, roofers, electricians, plumbers, etc. for the next year) because of the proximity of O’Gara and the behavior of this county’s officials in this transaction. Across the Creek, two individuals have abandoned plans to put additions on their homes because of O’Gara. Another two families planning on moving to Westmoreland County have already relocated to other counties because of O’Gara. How many retirees and families desire to spend their leisure time listening to and living within proximity of a mercenary training facility? I haven’t met any, have you? Do you think this will increase property values? Think again!
Is the Board’s practice of recessing regular meetings (continuing the balance of same to another time and place) truly viewed by many citizens as dysfunctional or indicative of “something gone awry?” Assuming that there exists a need for additional gatherings of the Board periodically, then how would you suggest that such be provided for?
If the intent is to promote secrecy and avoid citizen input, then clearly “something has gone awry.” If it is for practical purposes such as meeting with the School Board (as happened last week) then we see no objection. Any “additional gatherings” of the Board should be handled with appropriate notice to the public just as the law provides.
Again, thank you for your letter. Hopefully the above narrative answers your questions and explains some of the frustration and anger being expressed by local citizens. We hope to hear from you with some concrete suggestions on zoning changes as well as restrictions on O’Gara’s use of agricultural land. We would be happy to meet with you to discuss those issues.
Margaret Quinn Robert Quinn
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:28
- Published on Wednesday, 19 August 2009 17:28
- Hits: 629
The county government answered Westmoreland County Citizens Association’s Phase 2 Washington District sewer project questions one week after the written inquiry was faxed to the office of County Administrator Norm Risavi.
The document submitted by the citizen group known as WCCA noted the presence of sewer project consulting engineer Charles Riedlinger of Resource International at the board’s July 13 meeting.
- Last Updated on Thursday, 13 August 2009 15:54
- Published on Thursday, 13 August 2009 15:54
- Hits: 590
A CBS television news camera crew covering O’Gara Group’s move to Westmoreland had visited the county on June 8 but declined to stay around for that month’s evening Board of Supervisors meeting.
On August 10 an ABC television news camera crew visited the county to cover reactions to O’Gara Group’s arrival on property purchased from Bryan Chandler several weeks ago. That crew also opted not to stick around for the evening Board of Supervisors meeting.
On June 8 and August 10 Westmoreland resident Bob Quinn was prevented from videoing the Board of Supervisors meetings. Quinn successfully filmed the Westmoreland Industrial Development Authority’s meeting on June 29 and county government authorities subpoenaed a copy of that meeting video. That video has been displayed on The Journal's website at www.journalpress.com since the June 29 meeting.The Journal was present this Monday evening when Westmoreland Sheriff’s Office employees Ron Hundley and Bill England prevented Quinn from entering the Supervisors’ G. D. English Building meeting room with the camera in his hand. “You can’t take that in there with you,” Quinn was told as he and others went through the security screening protocols that were instituted by the Sheriff’s Office and local government on July 13.
“Cameras in courtrooms are prohibited,” the deputies explained.
- Last Updated on Tuesday, 04 August 2009 22:31
- Published on Tuesday, 04 August 2009 22:31
- Hits: 493
The sales transaction is official. Car dealer S. Bryan Chandler has sold O’Gara Training and Services, LLC approximately 330.0 acres of land that is situated between Westmoreland Industrial park and the upper reaches of a Nomini tributary.
The deed that governs the transaction was filed in the Westmoreland Circuit Court on July 30 and indicates that the A-1, Agriculture zoned property assessed at $989,700.00 was in fact purchased for $2,500,000.00 on July 28.
Language in the deed reveals that “for and in consideration of an IRC Section 1031 Tax-Free Exchange, and of other good and valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the GRANTOR does grant and convey unto the GRANTEE, with GENERAL WARRANTY OF TITLE and ENGLISH COVENANTS, the real estate hereinafter described as follows [on an attachment identified as Schedule A].”
- Last Updated on Monday, 03 August 2009 22:34
- Published on Monday, 03 August 2009 22:34
- Hits: 488
Believe it or not full scale planning for the annual Montross Fall Festival is well underway. Each year the festival seems to get bigger and better. This year will be the best ever!
Reserve Friday evening October 2 as the start of the Festival and all day Saturday October 3 for the parade, music, booths, kid's zone, food and who knows what all. Between now and then we'll be providing overall information on the Festival and details on some of the many attractions. As just one example of the size and scope of this year's Festival, we're starting off with some background and thoughts from our Grand Marshal.