- Last Updated on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 18:30
- Published on Wednesday, 20 May 2009 18:30
- Hits: 367
At a meeting last Monday, every public comment speaker except Bill Alverson had concerns about either about The O’Gara Group’s plans to locate its paramilitary consulting establishment in Westmoreland County or an already established bud-bog enterprise that disturbs its neighbors but which county officials appear unable to control.
Bill Alverson wanted to talk about roadside trash and grass that VDOT lacks the revenue to mow.
“I worry about safety with all the trash we have along our roads,” said Alverson. “Can’t somebody find a way to increase the fines for littering? Then we could get money for VDOT to mow the grass!”
Mud-bog neighbors Gerald and Sherry Fisher reiterated previously aired complaints about the disruptive mud-bog events and the county government's failure to enforce conditions it attached to that land use activity. As a result, the Fishers say disturbances associated with the mud-bog activities caused their home’s value to plummet.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 18:25
- Published on Wednesday, 13 May 2009 18:25
- Hits: 632
There were a few familiar faces in this Monday’s Westmoreland County Board of Supervisors meeting room. The rest of the Board’s unusually large audience never went to school with veteran Supervisors Darryl Fisher and Woody Hynson.
A substantial portion of the new faces that packed the May 11meeting room are recently retired urban professionals who now reside in the jurisdiction’s waterfront subdivisions. These are people skilled at utilizing cutting edge technology, intellectuals who don’t shrink from rolling up their sleeves to engage in grueling research as they pursue answers to the kinds of questions their elected officials hesitate to entertain.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 06 May 2009 19:04
- Published on Wednesday, 06 May 2009 19:04
- Hits: 485
As an elected official, I am often asked to help with things that have nothing to do with my constitutional responsibility of acting as a representative.
Thus I, along with Senator Stuart, Sheriff Balderson and others, were recently asked to speak at a candlelight vigil at the Westmoreland County Courthouse. The vigil was in recognition of the victims of crime and was in direct response to recent unsolved violent crimes – including a murder.
The event was organized by Katherine Cross, whose son died after complications from a shooting and botched home invasion. Clearly, Ms. Cross is carrying the burden of a lost child, and she is channeling that sorrow into positive action by organizing the whole community.
Those who were at the vigil were young and old, male and female, black and white. Indeed, the cross section of the crowd represented a cross section of the county – proof that crime has no boundaries.
Indeed, to me, the effect of a violent crime is like that of a rock thrown into a pond. The initial splash might be the crime, but the waves and wake coming from that impact reverberate much farther than the splash itself. The larger the rock, the worse the waves. Similarly, the smoother the water – from smaller communities – means the wake has a disproportionate impact.
In my opinion, Virginia does a pretty good job of helping victims of crime and actually has a Victims Bill of Rights.
But that begs the question, who is the victim? Virginia’s Victims Bill of Rights and most other victims’ rights laws recognize the following individuals as crime victims: anyone – spouses, children, parents and guardians -- suffering emotional or financial harm as a direct result of a felony or certain misdemeanors. (The included misdemeanors are: assault and battery, assault and battery against a family or household member, stalking, sexual battery, attempted sexual battery, and driving while intoxicated.)
To help to ensure that crime victims are informed of their rights, Virginia law actually requires that investigating law enforcement agencies provide victims with written information about their rights. Victims are given a telephone number to call in order to receive more information and assistance regarding their rights.
Crime victims, and certain witnesses, have the right to request that certain information remain confidential. For example, a crime victim may request that courts, police departments, sheriff’s offices, commonwealth’s attorneys and defense attorneys not disclose, except among themselves their home address, telephone number, or place of employment. This might be common sense but is not a rule that has always been followed.
Similarly, in Virginia, victims have opportunities to make the courts aware of the full impact of the crime, are informed of their rights, receive authorized services, and are heard at all critical stages of the criminal justice process. They are also informed of when the perpetrator of a crime is set to be released.
And while all of this is worthy, it can never undue the crime that is done. And, for that reason, I am always willing to travel to events like the one held at the courthouse – official duty or not.
Delegate Albert Pollard, Jr., represents the 99th District in Virginia’s House of Delegates. You may contact his office in Lancaster Courthouse at (804) 462-5940 or visit his website at www.albertpollard.com.
Delegate Albert C. Pollard, Jr.
- Last Updated on Thursday, 24 January 2013 15:43
- Published on Wednesday, 29 April 2009 18:38
- Hits: 468
Members of The Westmoreland County Citizens Association had plenty of company when they gathered for this Monday night’s monthly meeting at the Montross firehouse. Regular Association meeting attendees were joined by a delegation from the recently formed Westmoreland County Citizens for Change.
Readers will note from this paper’s recent reportings that new voices have been heard at recent Board of Supervisors public comment segments. Retired professionals who have made their homes on the county’s waterfront have come forward in recent months to express concern about O’Gara Group’s intention to establish a paramilitary training facility on a nearby 350-acre tract.
Amended sales contracts stipulate that O’Gara Group will purchase the county government’s reportedly dilapidated industrial shell building and companion 25 acres as well as car dealer Bryan Chandler’s adjacent 325 acres as soon as July 1.
The public learned of the O’Gara deal on January 11, when the initial purchase contract was approved. The Westmoreland County Citizens Association membership voiced immediate opposition to the local government’s secretive behavior during an 18-month negotiating period.
Since January 11, individual members of the Citizens Association have publicly expressed their opposition to O’Gara Group’s intentions. A majority of that organization’s membership shares the opinion that bringing the O’Gara facility to Westmoreland would be a disservice to the county residents.
Since O’Gara Group made its intentions known, individual Citizens Association members have expressed their feelings whenever the Board of Supervisors has allowed private citizens to speak.
Citizens Association President Kennon Morris shared his opposition to O’Gara Group during a recent Board of Supervisors meeting and was chastised by a member of the Board. He subsequently made it clear that he was speaking for himself and not the Citizens Association.
The Citizens Association has sometimes been criticized for being too negative, but many of its members have also criticized the organization for being too accommodating to the local government.
“All we do is talk,” said one man at a recent Citizens Association meeting.
At this month’s meeting, the Citizens Association regulars were possibly outnumbered by the Westmoreland County Citizens for Change visitors who waited for the Association’s regular monthly business to conclude.
Bob Quinn was the first speaker from the new group. Quinn explained that Westmoreland County Citizens for Change was created in recent weeks “to fight O’Gara and to do other things.
“We should probably join WCCA,” Bob Quinn commented. “We are going to need a lot of help. Perhaps we should join WCCA and vice versa.”
The new organization immediately launched an anti-O’Gara petition drive that is ongoing. Committees are being formed to pursue specific taskings the membership hopes will result in improvements broader segments of the community can embrace.
The visitors talked about probable O’Gara impacts and it became immediately apparent that research on the subject has reached a new level of sophistication.
Most compelling during this Monday night’s discussion was the first-hand experience that three or four Citizens for Change visitors shared with the Association regulars.
The first of those speakers described himself as a retired mercenary who had received formal training to kill other people and who now lives in Westmoreland. He recalled some high points of his training.
“We were told to stay out of bars and to avoid talking [to the locals],” something that speaker and others said most trainees should be expected to ignore.
“I can tell you that you don’t want to be around those guys,” the man related. “I don’t think the police around here can handle them. They’re good people, but they don’t get invited to headquarters ‘cause they aren’t wanted!”
Another retired paramilitary professional quoted in a previous edition of this paper concurred with the first speaker and warned that the O’Gara trainees aren’t the types county residents would want to encounter in a local restaurant.
A third individual described himself as a retired mercenary from Berlin. “These are dangerous buys they’re talking about bringing into Westmoreland County,” he began.
“Who needs a paramilitary group in your back yard? We don’t need private organizations like O’Gara. We have our own military. Wasn’t this how Stalin and Hitler got started? Won’t the people overseas hate us when we send our mercenaries over there?”
The first retired paramilitary professional spoke again, sharing recent research findings directly counter to the local government’s publicly stated assertion.
“They do train foreign nationals,” he said.
A woman from the new group then shared some research. She had found an Internet posting from a self-described mercenary with an Hispanic surname who is currently searching for a job.
“Looking for private security detail, Pimp Daddy is Crucible trained and wants work in Afghanistan,” she read from the computer generated document. The woman then recited a list of Virginia localities where paramilitary training establishments currently exist and warned that their numbers are on the rise. “They’re mushrooming,” she explained.
Yet another member of the new organization told The Journal that the federal government’s stimulus package includes as much as a billion dollars to subsidize establishment of mercenary training establishments.
“O’Gara Group will get its share of the federal money,” she explained.
The initial speaker delivered a grim prediction before the meeting ended. The contemplated Westmoreland County acreage and the 920 acres in Shenandoah Valley are too small. Such facilities, he explained, require larger areas. After they are established in a jurisdiction, they will expect to expand, the man explained.
It was remembered that O’Gara’s Jim Noe told the Westmoreland residents who gathered for the briefing at Carmel United Methodist Church that O’Gara Group would in fact expand its facility if the initial effort met with success.
That same evening at Carmel Church a neighboring landowner had been concerned about stray bullets making his own property unsafe. Noe told the prospective neighbor that O’Gara Group would purchase an easement if stray bullets did become a problem.
Critics maintain that O’Gara activities will cause the values of their own nearby properties to plummet and will force them to sell their homes. Local residents maintain that offers to buy nearby property are already being made by a county resident known to have close ties to the O’Gara Group.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 16:30
- Published on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 16:30
- Hits: 573
O’Gara Group was in the news last Thursday in another part of the state. A Westmoreland resident had found an April 16 reporting in The Northern Virginia Daily that offered hope that the paramilitary training entity had shifted its plans from the 350-acre location immediately east of Montross to 1,000 acres in the upper Shenandoah Valley.
On April 17 the Journal received an email from a reader whose identity was unclear but whose message was worthy of pursuit.
“I see from the recent article by Mr. Knight,” wrote Nomercs, “that the mercenary company O’Gara Group, not content to outrage just the citizens of Westmoreland County and the Town of Montross, is at it again, using one of their surrogate mercenaries, Dave Dolan, listed as a branch manager of the company, to apply to build a facility in Shenandoah County under the guise of the ‘Shenandoah Valley Training Center.’
“How stupid does O’Gara think we are? They have previously sent Dolan, as an overt representative of the O’Gara Company, to deal with the citizens of Louisa and Essex counties (where he was promptly sent packing from both) and now, while still negotiating in ‘good faith’ with the secretive, greedy, and non-representational county leaders in Westmoreland County who are apparently lured by the Siren’s Song of cash for a trash ‘shell building’ that should never have been built in the first place, and the promise of lots of jobs (yeah right, lots of former Navy SEALS living in Westmoreland), they are attempting to do an equally treacherous deal with the good citizens of Shenandoah, apparently as a back up Play B when they ultimately get run out of Westmoreland.
“Well, duh, O’Gara, ever heard of Google? Just because some of us live in rural counties doesn’t mean we don’t have electricity and can’t do research!
“O’Gara already has one training center in Virginia near Danville. They have apparently placated most of those folks and should be happy with that. They sure haven’t done anything but to show deception to those of us in Westmoreland and now, apparently, our brothers and sisters in Shenandoah.
“This,” the emailed messenger then concluded, “is the business equivalent to inviting two girls to the prom. Well, no thanks. We both need to sit this dance out!”
With electric power and Google in service in rural Westmoreland, the April 16 article was only a few computer strokes away. Residents in Shenandoah County were reportedly concerned about the military training center the O’Gara employee proposed to build and grass-roots opposition was immediate.
According to the report, the O’Gara opponents’ Keep Westmoreland Rural web page quickly became a model for the Keep Shenandoah rural web page created by the O’Gara employee’s opponents in Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley.
Efforts are being made to raise money to hire a lawyer to oppose establishment of the proposed paramilitary training facility in the valley. The Shenandoah County Planning Commission will entertain Dolan’s request as soon as May 7.
Dolan’s proposal includes amenities such as driving course and the multiple shooting ranges that are central to O’Gara’s Westmoreland County plans. But O’Gara has not invited another girl to the dance.
Instead, an April 20 article published in the Northern Virginia Daily reveals that Dolan is no longer an O’Gara employee. On April 16 that paper reported that “Joyce Wegryniak, the county’s zoning subdivision administrator, said Wednesday that Dolan filed his [special use] application Monday night and had wanted to be incorporated before doing so, but he was rushed to meet a deadline to May’s Planning Commission agenda.”
According to members of Westmoreland County’s local government, O’Gara Group will never need to file a special use request to establish the facility it envisions for the 350 acres in this Northern Neck jurisdiction.
According to Westmoreland officials, the O’Gara facility would be a school and schools can locate on the properties O’Gara has contracted to purchase in Westmoreland County as a matter of right.
The O’Gara project’s final site plan would be administratively approved by Bob Fink, the new zoning and subdivision official whose position was approved by the Westmoreland Supervisors during an April 13 meeting of the Board.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 20:24
- Published on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 20:24
- Hits: 446
A paramilitary training establishment known as The O’Gara Group wants to establish its operations on a 350-acre stretch of ground in Westmoreland County and nearby residents have become increasingly concerned.
As long ago as January 12 O’Gara Group contracted to buy 25 acres and an empty industrial shell building from the county government to complement the adjacent 325-acre tract car dealer Bryan Chandler has agreed to sell.
Prior to execution of the January 12, 2009 sales agreement, private citizens and most members of Westmoreland’s Industrial Development Authority had no knowledge that O’Gara had begun negotiating its purchase of the county’s property as long ago as 2007.
A Westmoreland Zoning Administrator developed a set of notes in 2008 supporting the supposition that the proposed paramilitary training establishment is in fact a school as defined in local ordinance. The establishment could accordingly locate on the referenced 350 acres without becoming the subject of any public hearing.
Three months have passed since O’Gara Group’s intentions became known the tiny group of citizens who attended the late night Board of Supervisors meeting on January 12. During that interval one citizen appealed the past Zoning Administrator’s determination that the facility O’Gara Group proposes meets the criteria associated with local ordinance’s definition of a school.
The appeal was withdrawn, but opposition to O’Gara Group’s intention has continued to rise. Last Thursday evening District 3 Supervisor Lynn Brownley met with local residents and was bombarded with concerns about O’Gara’s Westmoreland County plans.
This Monday afternoon unhappy Westmoreland residents staged a protest rally on the courthouse green. Those citizens later marched from the old Montross courthouse to the George D. English Building, where a Board of Supervisors meeting was in session.
On Thursday night Supervisor Brownley, a Westmoreland County native, entertained criticisms from residents whom he had not previously met. New voices expressed their displeasure to the Board of Supervisors during this Monday night’s Board meeting.
As was previously reported, not all members of the Westmoreland County Citizens Association believe a paramilitary training establishment would be bad for Westmoreland County.
Most Citizens Association members have nonetheless been adamant that the county officials were inappropriately secretive during the eighteen-month period in which the as yet unidentified members of the local government attempted to recruit the paramilitary establishment to locate on the industrial park’s 25-acre remnant.
Individuals associated with the Citizens Association found themselves in a minority when Brownley held his constituents’ meeting last Thursday. New people had come forward to criticize the actions of their local government.
This Monday night Board of Supervisors Chairman Darryl Fisher, another Westmoreland County native, exhibited difficulty deciphering the new names that appeared on the meeting’s public comment sign-up sheet.
The afternoon rally provided an opportunity for individuals to become better acquainted. Some of the people who attended Brownley’s Thursday night meeting in the George D. English Building swapped phone numbers and names and gathered as a smaller group on Saturday morning in a private residence.
Internet web pages and new email addresses have been and are being established for the sole purpose of disseminating information on the O’Gara subject. A second protest rally is already in the works for May and the O’Gara opposition is becoming increasingly diverse.
During this Monday night’s Board of Supervisors public comment segment, resident Robert Quinn was the first county resident to speak. Quinn had been quiet since his arrival in Westmoreland County approximately seven years ago, but O’Gara Group’s arrival would change his life and he felt the time had come to make that feeling known.
Quinn struggled to find something in O’Gara Group’s intentions that would compel the county government to bring the question to the people in an advertised public hearing.
Kathy Scott was similarly unknown to the members of local government prior to this week’s meeting. She brought with her a copy of the county’s latest efforts to craft a modern comprehensive plan.
Scott related that the text in hand purported that any decisions the Westmoreland Supervisors make can be expected to significantly impact the county’s future, especially decisions associated with new development.
She noted the text’s finding that the county government must find ways to improve its communications with local residents. Scott then shared her own observation that the county government had not been appropriately transparent when efforts were made by public officials to bring O’Gara to Westmoreland.
Recruiting O’Gara is not the kind of economic development that reflects the visions of this community, Scott told the Board of Supervisors. She suggested that county officials found O’Gara Group’s intentions acceptable because no one else had come forward to purchase the unoccupied industrial shell building and the surrounding 25 acres of publicly owned land.
Scott then told the Supervisors that if her perception is in fact correct, the local government’s action is a disservice to the community.
“We want smart development, not companies that want to come to Westmoreland County because it’s a place that will allow them to do anything they want. If you gentlemen allow O’Gara to come, you’re opening a can of worms. I ask my own representative, Russ Culver, to vote no on this,” said Scott.
Don Neeley followed Kathy Scott to the podium. Neeley had not before addressed the Westmoreland County Board and he had lots to say about what can be expected at an O’Gara training facility because he is an alumnus of multiple training establishments whose programs are not unlike the O’Gara Group offerings.
“Having attended many different academies of this type, I’d like to tell you O’Gara Group would not be a good thing for a small community that will have to listen to the noise.
“O’Gara Group is in business to make money. I’ve looked at their training schedule in Danville. The cycle of classes overlaps and is repetitive. They would bring in the kind of people you wouldn’t want to have in your community.”
“Believe me,” he told the Westmoreland officials, “if O’Gara comes, these are the people who will be part of you. They will be in your face for a long, long time, eating pizza and drinking coffee with you in your restaurants.
“I encourage each and every one of you to go out and talk to others who have already been through this sort of thing!” Neeley told the members of the Board. More next week.
- Last Updated on Wednesday, 01 April 2009 19:08
- Published on Wednesday, 01 April 2009 19:08
- Hits: 420
The Westmoreland County Board of Zoning Appeals gathered for the 9 o’clock meeting this Monday morning but the session ended almost as soon as it began. On March 27 Joe Thompson’s lawyers withdrew the appeal whose consideration had been the purpose of that special meeting.
The county government maintained that it officially received the letter from the attorneys on Monday morning. On Monday afternoon the county’s Industrial Development Authority met with The O’Gara Group’s attorney, Senator Richard Stuart, and voted to extend the purchase contract’s closing date from April 1 to July 1, when O’Gara Group is also expected to close on its purchase of an adjacent tract.
It became understood on Monday that O’Gara Group had initially expected to close on its purchase of both the Chandler property and the county government’s industrial shell building and surrounding 25 acres on April 1.
According to Senator Stuart, O’Gara Group will pay car dealer Bryan Chandler $2.5 million for the 325-acre tract. Westmoreland County expects to receive $629,178 for its unoccupied industrial shell building and the last 25 acres of the park’s as yet undeveloped publicly owned land.
Westmoreland residents and most members of the county’s Industrial Development Authority knew nothing about the local government’s 18-month negotiations with O’Gara Group until a late night meeting on January 12, when the Authority approved an initial sales agreement.
Public opposition to the self-described security training facility’s intentions to locate in Westmoreland County was immediate. Two years earlier another corporation engaged in similar paramilitary training operations drew fire from local residents and subsequently withdrew its interest in a possible purchase of the industrial park and Chandler properties.
During 2007 a paramilitary-styled training establishment known as Crucible sustained a setback in Stafford County when questions were raised concerning the proposed facility’s ability to satisfy the local zoning’s definition of a school.
The question initially before the Westmoreland County Board of Zoning Appeals this Monday contained echoes of the years-old Stafford litigation whose outcome is still pending in the courts.
Westmoreland County’s local government is in possession of a twenty-some page opinion paper that carries a September 2008 date and is being attributed to the jurisdiction’s late Director of Planning, Gary Ziegler. The document maintains that the facility O’Gara Group hopes to establish is a school.
If the facility is in fact a school, O’Gara Group can locate on the unoccupied industrial shell building property and Chandler land without ever having to go through a public hearing process. Its intended operations would be a by-right use.
On Monday afternoon Senator Stuart revealed that O’Gara Group and the county government anticipated a Board of Zoning Appeals’ concurrence with the Ziegler opinion when that afternoon’s Industrial Development Authority session was scheduled for the purpose of gaining time to resolve a likely appeal of the Board of Zoning Appeals’ determination in the courts.
Some O’Gara project opponents previously expressed concern that the Board of Zoning Appeals proceeding would be no more than an exercise in futility because county officials knew which way the vote would go before the meeting was convened.
Another source close to The Journal maintained that a local Board of Zoning Appeals had no statutory authority to even entertain Joe Thompson’s question concerning the Ziegler opinion that O’Gara’s intended establishment is in fact a school.
The Thompson attorneys’ March 27 letter withdrawing the appeal keeps the central question open. The opinion document attributed to Ziegler is characterized as “only a generalized decision about land uses for schools and military forces.”
According to Thompson’s attorneys, the document attributed to Ziegler contains other defects that support the local government’s need to develop a more detailed rationale for maintaining the proposed facility’s characterization as a school that can be established on those properties by right.
Thompson’s appeal to the Board of Zoning Appeals, the March 27 letter additionally explained, was withdrawn at least in part because the county government could not provide the Board of Zoning Appeals with the documentation it needed to render a relevant decision. Its members would be asked instead to engage in futile speculation.
Thompson’s lawyers advised the local government of their intention to “seek a future decision from the zoning administrator based on the specifics of the O’Gara proposal.” The attorneys will ask the county government to provide them with a copy of the letter of compliance that the county promised to issue to O’Gara Group in the January 12 and March 30 purchase agreements.
Such a “letter of compliance” would provide O’Gara with the local government’s assurance that the land O’Gara purchased could in fact be used as the site of the intended tactical training facility.
Late on Monday afternoon County Attorney Tom Bondurant told The Journal and a Westmoreland County Citizens Association officer that there isn’t going to be any future opinion on the pending question concerning the proposed establishment’s ability to meet local ordinance’s definition of a school.
“Then we’ll have to pursue our legal options,” homeowner Joe Thompson said when apprised of Bondurant’s response still later on Monday afternoon.
Westmoreland Industrial Development Authority members Paul Tsompanas, Bryan Oliff, Dick Allison, Jimmy Latane and Rebecca Gillions attended the 3 o’clock meeting on Monday afternoon. All four men voted to extend the purchase contract. Rebecca Gillions declined to participate in the March 30 vote.
The English Building meeting room was packed during that session. Three uniformed Sheriff’s Office deputies were present and it was understood that most of the private citizens attending the session were unhappy about the O’Gara Group’s intentions to consummate the deal.
O’Gara Group’s Jim Noe had meet with local residents several weeks earlier. Citizens characterized Noe as a very personable young man but few if any of the 75-100 private citizens attending that highly cordial question and answer session went away convinced that O’Gara Group would be good for the people of Westmoreland.